This has taken a lot of time and thought but I think I have it, more or less. It is not as complex as I make it sound. Forgive me if you already know the following or know better. This is only my opinion and not established fact….
I believe the problem is that the numbers which we see stamped on gearboxes (below the line at the front) are not gearbox model numbers at all !
The number '74' below shows that the gearbox was fitted to a Morris Minor. If precisely the same gearbox had been fitted to a Wolseley or an MG the number would have been different.This is not a serial number but relates either to an engine model number or possibly a car model number - this detail needs more research.
My theory is that the William Morris group introduced a numbering system over their entire private car range for engines in late 1931. Wolseley folk call them 'sanction numbers' and the MG Triple-M Register calls them 'Model codes' . The number '74' for example should only appear on a gearbox fitted new to a Minor in the Morris factory (perhaps someone can clarify if the OHC Minor and SV Minor shared this gearbox as a factory fitting).I believe the numbers were issued in chronological order starting at '50' with the updated Wolseley Hornet in September 1931.I believe this system probably finished with a 'major shake-up' in the Group soon after the introduction of the MG PB.
Because the number stamped on the gearbox is mostly seen on Wolseley made gearboxes I assumed it was specifically a Wolseley gearbox number, but from the MG register I have inferred that the model number was based on the engine (or possibly the car model) and stamped on the gearbox regardless of who made it. So the same numbering system would/should apply to an ENV gearbox regardless.
Here is 'my' integrated list as it stands so far. I have left a space on the right for dates when these numbers first appeared and in order to make the list fit on an A4 page I have left out the unknown numbers.We have 43 known number codes out of roughly a possible 150.
There is only one number clash and to me this suggests a mistake. I believe the Triple-M Register has attributed the model number '65' to the MG C-type incorrectly. Here is a C-type gearbox image which I have taken the liberty of copying from Barry Foster's article on Triple M gearboxes - do you see '65' or '654' or possibly '6 54' ? Do you interpret what you see as '65' ?
In the chronology '54' is spot on (D & C developed at much the same time). '65' did not appear on a Wolseley till June 1932 which seems to me make more sense. Why would MG have gone outside the system and allocated '65' to the C-type? I have asked Robin Hamblett (Triple-M Registrar) about this but from his email I am not sure if he understands the question and he cannot help.
The list above would run to 150 lines if the blanks were included. I can only guess the blanks are mostly other Morris cars but this needs more research.In fact the whole list is entirely open to improvement. Because of the access needed to cross check all the details every step towards improving the list is an uphill battle.