Page 3 of 3
Re: UX9251
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:15 pm
by Toby
Re: UX9251
Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:43 pm
by Ian Grace
Hi Toby,
Well, we tried!
She does look really good - and I guess the (relatively) expensive bit is behind you now. I've just put before and after shots in M 140 this morning which goes to the printer tomorrow - only four weeks after the last issue.
Ian
Re: UX9251
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 8:46 am
by Toby
Ian, Sadly your engine you sold me has the head loose and knackered studs/worn bores. Wish I'd checked before fitting!!!
My other spare is now "rebuilt"ready to go in PJ and then after testing will be going into UX, fingers crossed!

Re: UX9251
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:56 pm
by Ian Grace
Re: UX9251
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:32 pm
by Toby
painting and chroming of all running gear and fittings inc. wing repairs and painting. all coach trimming and floor panels etc.
Linda has lost 1/3 of her shifts at work and we are having to tighten belts, also any savings I have are index linked and untouchable at present due to market prices. On the up side the running gear and some of the other work is mainly labour related so some progress will be made while I try and sort finances for outsourced jobs on the car.
Re: UX9251
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:36 pm
by Ian Grace
Sorry to hear that Toby, you are not alone - even over here, things are bleak at best. I hope everything works out for you both in the New Year.
Re: UX9251
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2011 6:53 pm
by Toby
finally have engine running in PJ as a test bed. Warming through as I write then retighten head, oil change and build up clutch. Put gearbox etc. back, run a few miles on it as test, then out it comes and into UX. Simples!!!
Re: UX9251
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 4:16 pm
by Ian Grace
Good job, Toby!

Re: UX9251
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:01 am
by Toby
lack of oomph, low compression on 3 cylinders, drove for about 5 miles to see if rings freed up but no joy. Original engine going back into PJ to see if high oil pressure cured and this engine now on engine stand for inspection, again!!! Beginning to wonder if it would have been easier to rebuild the engine that came out of UX to begin with....
Re: UX9251
Posted: Wed May 29, 2013 9:59 pm
by Ian Grace
Toby,
I was just launching the May Newsletter with that super pic of the Gilg '33 tourer being hauled out of the Chimala River when I noticed that the rear of the hood has two vertical rows of poppers and looks like it can be opened and rolled up. I've never seen this feature on an open Minor before. The OHC tourer hoods certainly weren't made this way. (What about the SV 2-seaters?) It's not a mod. for the African heat, as we know that the only mod. done by Morris was to fit a lower ratio CWP.
Mind you, that rear sidescreen looks a bit second-hand.

Re: UX9251
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:44 am
by Toby
small progress but re-plyed firewall, scuttle and brackets fitted!